Our fearless leader-Rush Limbaugh

 Welcome Dittoheads
         and our conservative friends.

The Rush Limbaugh Club of Orange County meets at 8:00 a.m. 
on the second Saturday of each month.  

Our events page has information on our next meeting ...
(and assorted bits of  news and humor).


   

 

Many pro-Republican talkers helped push more votes to Obama

The Cal State Fullerton instructor is a contributing editor to Liberty
 
Many of the Democrats who now control Congress have made it clear they will target
"conservative" talk radio when Obama takes office. Specifically, they want to reinstate
the "fairness doctrine" (ended in 1987), which required radio stations to provide equal
time for opposing political views whenever a political opinion was aired. President-elect
Barack Obama, no fan of talk radio (especially of Sean Hannity), may well sign such a
bill.
 
Should the Democrats succeed, it would be clear that the Democrats would be trying to
silence an opposing communication channel, and talk radio fans would be rightly outraged.
The Democrats, who already dominate TV and print journalism, the entertainment industry
and academia, would then face virtually no criticism.
 
But an interesting question is whether it really would be in the Democrats' best interests to
target talk radio. A case can be made that Obama's win was caused in great measure by
the so-called "conservative" talkerati.
 
The fact is that the majority of radio talk show hosts are more populist than conservative.
Yes, they typically have socially conservative views, such as opposition to abortion and
gay marriage. But they are also often economic populists, opposing immigration and (in
many cases) free trade. And they likely cost John McCain the election.
 
The major stars in talk radio vociferously opposed illegal immigration, screaming endlessly
about illegals stealing jobs, driving down wages and of some being dangerous criminals.
They bashed "Big Business" for trying to get some kind of compromise immigration
legislation though Congress in 2007. The proposed compromise would have increased
legal immigration, at a time when unemployment was less than 5 percent, and legal
immigration was restricted to less than 1/3 of 1 percent of the population annually, a paltry
amount in the face of the need at the time for labor. And they turned with fury on McCain,
who tried in vain to resolve the issue in 2007.
 
This set the stage for McCain's loss in 2008. First, by continuously bashing McCain
throughout the primaries, the talkerati helped turn part of the Republican base against
him. On Election Day, a significant number of Republicans either stayed home or even
voted against McCain.
 
Worse yet, the tone on talk radio at times is very ugly and explicitly anti-Latino. The harsh
attacks helped give Obama a decisive edge among Latinos. Bush, who ran in 2004 as a
moderate on immigration and took time to often praise legal immigrants, won 44 percent of
the Latino vote. McCain, who was forced to spend much of his time during the primaries
trying to prove to the Republican base he was not weak on illegal immigration, earned 31
percent of the Latino vote, and it is clear that had an even stauncher opponent of illegal
immigration, like Rep. Tom Tancredo, won the nomination, he would have fared far, far
worse.
 
Moreover, the number of Latino voters jumped from 7.8 million in 2004 to 10 million this
election – a 28 percent increase. There was an intense anger at being unfairly singled out
for abuse. Obama cleverly ran ads replaying unfortunate remarks by talk-radio king Rush
Limbaugh about Mexican immigrants – taken out of context, but still repellent – to great
effect. Obama picked up Southwestern states that had previously voted Republican,
winning 73 percent of the Latino vote in Colorado and 76 percent in Nevada.
 
The populist talkerati have deepened the divisions among Republicans and have alienated
Latinos, who are in most regards culturally and economically conservative. With "friends"
like the talk show superstars, the Republican Party hardly needs enemies.
 

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/talk-radio-immigration-2255389-percent-mccain

There are four comments thus far, only one is at all "fair and balanced":

 

"talk radio" like "soap operas" is just entertainment. Intelligent, educated people don't ssek out talk show hosts to guide their politics, religion or economics, instead they seek out credible sources to make informed decisions on important issues. the fairness doctrine 
is another useless piece of legislation that will demand tax dollars to support the fairness doctrine agency to monitor radio talk shows. 
In essence it will be just a costly, self-serving government appendage .

12/15/2008 5:17:08 AM
Recommended (3)

 

                                                           

                                              Thought for the Season:


                 "Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
                 Jesus Christ and the American G.I.

                 One died for your soul and the other for your freedom!"


...   .              ~ Unknown!......                    Image

.


Image ..Image..Fly-By Complaint @ Luke AFB

.
_________________
Once A Marine - Always A Marine
Image
Semper Fidelis, LtCol Larry M. COLLINS Ret.

 

       

 


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech...."


 

Do liberals actually believe that conservative opinions are pornography?

Are liberals so threatened that they're plotting and planning right now, at this very minute, to silence conservative thoughts and opinions from the public airwaves?

         You be the judge.

FOX News asked Senator Chuck Schumer if liberals in Congress will try to implement the so-called Fairness Doctrine - a measure specifically designed to shut down Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and conservative talk radio.

         Schumer replied indignantly:

“Do you think we should allow people to put pornography on the air? Absolutely not. Particularly on television or radio."

         Huh? No, it's NOT a joke! And he didn't stop there.

         Schumer nastily admonished decent Americans for some imagined hypocrisy:

“The very same people who don’t want the Fairness Doctrine want the FCC [Federal Communications Commission] to limit pornography on the air.... That’s not consistent.”

         It's almost beyond belief.

         We couldn't have made it up!

Is Schumer so unhinged, that he's not even capable of understanding the fundamental difference between smut and political expression?

         Craig Parshall, general counsel for the National Religious Broadcasters said:

"I was stunned by Senator Schumer’s suggestion that by keeping filth off the air, the federal government has somehow become empowered to take over the control of legitimate programming content of broadcasters."

         But Parshall missed one very important point.

With control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, Schumer and his liberal colleagues are twisting the First Amendment’s guarantees of Freedom of Speech and of the Press – ALL TO SET THE STAGE TO SILENCE RUSH, HANNITY AND OTHERS.

If you're a liberal, you can burn the flag, put four-letter-word bumper stickers on your car, commit lewd acts on-stage, play profane rap music loudly on your car radio, produce, rent and distribute the most disgusting filth in broad daylight and on the Internet in plain view of minors and even use taxpayer dollars to depict Jesus suspended in bodily waste.

But when it comes to shutting down conservative thoughts and opinions, now that they have grabbed the reins of power, liberals are making control over the content of speech a top priority!

         They're plotting and maneuvering behind the scenes to make it happen RIGHT NOW!

         Peter Kirsanow writing in National Review Online tells us why this fight is URGENT:

"Imposition of some form of the Fairness Doctrine likely will be one of the Democrats' agenda items for the first 100 days of the new administration. It's important that conservatives begin working now to stop it."

         Kirsanow went on:

"Waiting until Inauguration Day to get geared up is too late. By that time the Fairness Doctrine Express will be at full steam— wavering Democrats will be pressed to support the new Democratic president, weak-kneed Republicans will want to display comity, the mainstream media will not be saddened to see talk radio annihilated and much of the public will be too enraptured by Obama's Camelot inauguration to notice or care."

         Kirsanow is right.

There is not a moment to lose. If we take a stand now, we can defeat this threat to our civil liberties.

         If we wait, it will be too late.

"Congress Shall Make No Law..."

Use the hyperlink below and bombard President George W. Bush and the Republican Members of the Senate with your Blast Faxes. Demand that they stand firm against any attempt by liberals in Congress to effectively outlaw the First Amendment.

We must act now! Liberals in Congress may try to sneak the Fairness Doctrine into legislation any day now. Liberal pundits inside the Beltway and members of the elite media are already attempting to sell conservative Senators on the notion that their only chance for political survival is to display comity. Unless they hear from you now, they WILL believe it, as they have in the past.

We can win this fight. It only takes 40 Senators to stand firm . But if patriotic Americans do not speak up, we will lose this fight for our liberties.


http://www.cfiflistmanager.org/unfairnessdoctrinenmii.html

AOL Members Use This Hyperlink

If the hyperlink above does not function, please copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser.




You might think it's almost beyond belief, but our Founding Fathers understood and dreaded the danger we presently face.

They feared the danger to such an extent that they ratified, as the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, words they thought would be our primary line of defense against the government evolving into a tyranny that would trample on the rights of the people.

         To them the danger was real:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech...."

Newsmax.com

Dear Newsmax Reader:

Please find below a special message from our sponsor, Center for Individual Freedom. They have some important information to share with you. Thank you.

Newsmax.com


RUSH:  Hey, folks, how about our boy, Joe Biden?  Hey, stand up, Joe, tell us again what's going to happen when Obama gets elected.  You hear what Biden said?  ABC is reporting that Joe Biden is warning now of an international crisis.  The world, multiple nations will test Obama just as JFK was tested the first six months of his administration.  Biden is guaranteeing trouble under Obama.  We can also assume that McCain would not cause such a test to occur from leaders around the world, but Biden is out there saying multiple countries, he said, "Your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right," in how we deal with whatever it is.  And he said, "I could give you five or six scenarios." 

Love Joe Biden.  He says it would be patriotic to pay higher taxes and that this country is going to face an international crisis or two only if Obama is elected.  We will not face an international crisis, according to Biden, if McCain is elected.  See, under McCain what we would get is lower taxes and apparently a far more peaceful world.  McCain's been tested, no one will screw with him according to Biden.  You know what a gaffe is, is when a politician tells the truth.  So with Obama we're going to get higher taxes, we're going to get new attacks on our country.  Biden says the world is going to test Obama.  What's it going to be, China taking Taiwan?  China taking North Korea?  Russia taking over a bordering country or two?  Israel being wiped off the map?  All the above?  What is it?  Biden's guaranteeing something like this.  He says it's a fair price for electing an inexperienced squirrel who wants ACORN to run our elections and can't wait to surrender in Iraq.  And remember, folks, a squirrel is just a rat with better PR.  

Colin Powell said that Biden would be ready to be president on day one.  Does Powell agree that the price for electing Obama is a world crisis?  Biden's starting this.  Biden is stating this as a fact beyond dispute.  He says it's a guarantee, that we are to mark his words.  Now, can you imagine if I said -- without Biden having had said this first -- if I had said that the election of Barack Obama will cause a guaranteed international crisis, can you imagine?  I mean, the Drive-Bys are in a tizzy over my little Colin Powell comment yesterday to Jonathan Martin of The Politico.  Can you imagine what they would do if I would come out before Biden and said what Biden had said?  I would be taking politics to the lowest common denominator. I would be a fearmonger. I would be irresponsible.  The Fairness Doctrine would be needed to shut me up.  I'm going to endorse Biden.  Biden's exactly right about this.  First time in a long time I'm going to agree with Biden.  He's exactly right.  We are going to get tested here.  Obama's going to get tested.  

What's amazing to me about Biden's statement, ladies and gentlemen, is I thought the election of Obama was going to make the world love us again.  I thought we're going to repair this busted image that we have all around the world, and the moment Obama is elected -- we don't have to wait 'til he's inaugurated -- from the moment he is elected, the world is going to (kissing sound) love us again.  They're going to want to kiss us everywhere they can.  They're going to be so happy, and here's Biden saying, (paraphrasing) "Oh, yeah, get ready, folks.  This young man, he's got what it takes, love this guy, this guy can handle it," speaking of Obama, "but he's going to get tested, we're going to get tested, I can guarantee you and we're going to need your support.  We're going to need your support in there because it's not going to be obvious we're doing the right thing at first."  (laughing.)

 

       

 

 
Sarah Palin takes on Charlie Gibson
 
September 12, 2008

TRANSCRIPT

 

RUSH:  I want to go to one Sarah Palin sound bite.  This is perhaps one of the highlights of Sarah Palin's interview.  It's number 23.  It is one of the highlights of the whole interview last night.  She's great in this.  I just want to set up this.  She would not allow Charlie Gibson to put different words in her mouth when she answers his question about Israel.  Now, just listen to this.  This is Gibson's question.  "What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?"

PALIN I don't think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security.

 
GIBSON:  So if we wouldn't second guess it and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that?

PALIN  I don't think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.

GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right?

PALIN  We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.

RUSH:  She would not let him put words in her mouth.  She would not let him trip her up. He tried 25 different ways to try to trip her up on that.  She's essentially saying, "Screw you, Charlie, did you hear my answer?  This is my answer, and I'm sticking to it.  You can ask it however many ways you want, but this is my answer."  This is just fabulous, people worried about how she did.  Play it again, listen to this, the resolve that she has in her answer here despite Charlie Gibson's attempt to get her to say, "Damn right we'll nuke you," because they want the headline, "Palin: Nuke Iran," that's what they want.  They tried it with her answer on Russia and NATO, misrepresenting that.  Here it is one more time, again, Charlie GIBSON's:  question, "What if Israel decided it felt threatened and needed to take out the Iranian nuclear facilities?"  

PALIN  I don't think that we should second guess the measures that Israel has to take to defend themselves, and for their security.

GIBSON:  So if we wouldn't second guess it and if they decided they needed to do it, because Iran was an existential threat, we would be cooperative or agree with that?

PALIN  I don't think we can second guess what Israel has to do to secure its nation.

GIBSON: So if it felt necessary, if it felt the need to defend itself by taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, that would be all right?

PALIN:   We cannot second guess the steps that Israel has to take to defend itself.

RUSH:  I just love that.  I just absolutely love it. 

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_091208/content/01125111.guest.html


From El Rushbo's Archives - Feb 28, 2008: 

 Alaskan: Governor Babe for VP!

RUSH:  The babe is the icing on the cake aspect, something the Democrats can't claim on their side.

CALLER:  Well, I can tell you that Governor Palin doesn't have to lift her chin up to 12 o'clock to get a good photo of her.

"Sarah Palin is the one we have been waiting for, and that's real."  

"John McCain is who he is.  It's Sarah Palin's party now." 

Rush 24/7 Quote - September 4th & 5th, 2008


Batman and Rush: Why McCain Will Win

By Jeffrey Lord
Published 8/19/2008 12:08:37 AM

OK. I'll walk out on a limb.

This election has already been decided. It's over. The winner is John McCain.

How, you are asking, could anybody be so utterly stupid to say such a thing in August? What about the polls showing Obama ahead? Haven't I heard about Obama-mania? The conventions haven't even been held!

Well, since you asked, I'll tell you.

Yes, I know how to read the polls. I've seen the television coverage of the adoring Obama crowds. Followed the "triumph" of the Obama European tour. Know that in some eyes McCain is "old." I've heard all the usual buzz about potential VPs and which possible number two brings what to which ticket. Listened to the usual back-and-forth between the rival campaigns. "Did so!" "Did not!" Yada-yada-yada, as Seinfeld might say.

To which I say: So what?

If you really want to know the outcome of this election, the answers are out there to be found right now. Look around. Take a good hard look at what is going on around us all. It requires only that we understand what we are seeing, beginning with two much reported events of the summer.

First, The Dark Knight broke movie records with first day earnings of over $66 million. The film has broken one record after another, just as films like Star Wars or a Star Wars sequel or Spiderman or a Spiderman sequel did in their time. All by himself, Bloomberg tells us, Batman is poised to boost Hollywood towards a record year of $10 billion in box office sales.

Second. Simultaneous to the huge success of The Dark Knight, Rush Limbaugh has celebrated his 20th year as the host of his nationally syndicated number one radio show, signing an 8-year contract for a reported $400 million. His show is heard on approximately 600 stations around the country, with the president of Premiere Radio Networks saying the show enjoys an "unprecedented platform of radio affiliates." In recent weeks Rush has received one big happy fist pump from everyone including but not limited to the President of the United States and the "Dittoheads" who listen to him regularly as part of an audience of 20 million a week.

So, as might be phrased by another character out of the world of Batman, riddle me this.

Why is Batman so popular? Why is Rush so popular? And what in the world does the popularity of either have to do with asserting as fact that Senator McCain has already won the presidential election over Senator Obama?

The answer is: you. "You" defined as a cultural American.

NO ONE OUT THERE -- with the exception of novelist Andrew Klavan's recent perceptive piece on Batman and President Bush in the Wall Street Journal -- seems to understand just why The Dark Knight is such a hit. With all due respect to the filmmakers, actors Christian Bale and the late Heath Ledger, the real star of this film is indisputably Batman. But just who is Batman? And why does he make those connected with him so rich every time he shows his cowl?

Batman is the cinematic (and comic book) personification of the way Americans like to see themselves. He is a rebel against the Establishment (and likewise with the Star Wars crew and Spiderman.) He is unafraid to act. He is willing to take risks. He could not possibly care less about what "feels good" or whether anything he says or does "makes sense" to a single other person. He runs on instinct. He is here to do the right thing. Nothing more, nothing less. He has a vision of Gotham City, a dream, that is not unlike the favorite phrase associated with his friend Superman (another movie sensation): Truth, Justice and the American Way.

Rush Limbaugh is the Batman of the airwaves. The reason Rush is celebrating 20 years on the air and is being rewarded with that great contract is precisely because he has the same qualities as Batman. Rush Limbaugh is a conservative rebel, instinctively so. He believes in the power of the American dream. Most importantly, he lives it, right down there in his own Bat Cave, his "Southern Command." He is completely unafraid to say exactly what's on his conservative mind, and couldn't care less what his liberal establishment critics say about him. Like Batman, he runs on his instincts, hopping into his broadcasting Batmobile daily and saying forthrightly that he knows what's wrong and how it should be fixed.

But what, you ask, does all of this have to do with predicting a McCain victory over Obama? For this I turn to my own guide to American culture, my friend Dr. Clotaire Rapaille. The man who, as mentioned awhile back, is famous for designing the Chrysler PT Cruiser, getting Americans to drink vast quantities of Folger's coffee and serving as a cultural consultant to companies like GE, AT&T and Boeing, among many others. Before the 2008 campaign got under way, Rapaille had similarly applied his culture theories to presidents and presidential campaigns, his conclusions as startling as they were accurate.

What is it that makes Americans choose anything the way they do? And specifically what does this mean when it comes to choosing presidents?

First, he explained to me, we should understand that every human has a brain divided into three parts. The cortex is the seat of logic, while the limbic deals with emotions. It is what he calls the "third brain" -- the "reptilian brain" -- that unmistakably dominates the other two. It houses a person's fundamental instinct for two and only two things: survival and reproduction. While every human walking the planet has these two instincts, some people are more "reptilian" than others. Those others could be depending more on their "cortex" -- the part of the brain that is home to logic, that controls intelligence. Or they can seem to run mostly on emotion. Yet without question, the research shows again and again that whether the subject is picking cars, coffee or presidents, people respond with their instincts. When this fact of life is overlaid with culture -- in the case of voters for president of the United States, American culture -- the result is easy to see.

While other cultures put a premium on thinking (the French) or order (the Germans), Americans want our presidents to respond just
as we do in our culture -- with their gut. An American presidential candidate, Rapaille says, "doesn't need to be extremely reptilian, 
only more reptilian than his opponent is." In particular, and he says this in terms of a cultural observation as opposed to a subjective condemnation, Americans are not culturally disposed to thinking. We prefer, as the Nike commercial has long said, to "just do it." We are a culture of action, of rebellion, of instinct. When Europeans or American liberals deride a George W. Bush or a Reagan as a "cowboy," they think they are hurling an insult. Yet most Americans see cowboys as heroes, so the insult effectively backfires. When it comes to choosing between two candidates for president, we gravitate instinctively to the one perceived as more "reptilian." Rapaille puts it this way: "We don't want our presidents to think too much."

Now.

Rush Limbaugh has made the observation that when Obama is away from his teleprompter the candidate's soaring rhetoric stumbles into a non-stop succession of hems and haws. Lots of "ahhhhs" and "uhhhhs" and "uhhhh...ahhhh...uhhhhs." To illustrate in entertaining fashion Limbaugh has even assembled a tape of Obama's hemmings and hawings from a solitary press conference, stringing them together to hilarious effect.

Rush is on to something here, a big something. What, after all, is Obama doing while he stutters around in verbal no man's land? 
The next time you see Obama in an unscripted TV appearance watch his face as he does this and you will see it in a flash. Obama is...yes...thinking. Telegraphing in utterly unconscious fashion to voters precisely what Rapaille says they do not want: a potential president who "thinks too much." Thinking translated here as indecisiveness, weakness, dawdling, timidity.

Remember Reagan on his philosophy about ending the Cold War? "We win, they lose," he said. The Soviets, he said, were "an evil empire." Nothing complicated. No Carter-esque agony of thought. Just a simple and direct use of the reptilian brain. If the striking air traffic controllers didn't stop breaking the law and get back to work pronto, Reagan said he would fire them. Pure and simple. They didn't - so he did. His poll numbers shot up. Remember all those "thinkers" over at the State Department who kept eliminating a specific phrase from Reagan's now famous speech in front of the Berlin Wall? Reagan kept putting it back. On the interesting grounds that it was he who had been elected president, not some State Department bureaucrat. The phrase: "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." The moment is now enshrined in American historical memory. Recall FDR on the Depression: "The American people want action and action now." Or Teddy Roosevelt demanding the return of a hostage by sending a telegram stating his expectation of the hostage-taker in the following fashion: "This government wants Pedicaris alive or Raisuli dead."

In each case, this was the bottom line of the survival instinct, the reptilian brain at work in a president.  It is no coincidence that Reagan, FDR and TR were three of America's most popular presidents.

ONCE I UNDERSTOOD Rapaille's point, I went back in American presidential history to look for myself at the outcome of every presidential election. Without question, unless there was some extraordinary circumstance (like a secret back room deal in the 1824 Adams-Jackson election) like clockwork the American people had elected the more "reptilian" candidate of those available as they perceived him to be. Issues came and issues went with the centuries, but the American tendency to go instinctively for the guy who seemed the most instinctively action oriented appeared time and time again. A roll call of winners perceived by the voters of their day (in direct comparison to their opponents) as action oriented, candidates who fearlessly went with their gut, include Andrew Jackson, Lincoln, the two Roosevelts, Wilson, Truman, Ike, JFK, Reagan, Clinton and George W. Bush. The sharper the image of a candidate as a serious thinker, a man who hesitates or who is perceived more as a talker than a doer, the more certain his defeat -- as with a John Quincy Adams, a Thomas E. Dewey, an Adlai Stevenson, a McGovern, Dole, Dukakis, Gore, or Kerry.

And, my bet is, Obama.

What, after all, are among McCain's supposed liabilities? His temper -- an action indicator if ever there was one. His support for the Iraq War -- war being the ultimate call to action. In the acknowledged asset column is McCain's own war record, the epitome of the reptilian American brain at work. This candidate flew directly over the heart of the enemy capital to drop his bombs, then gets captured and tortured, with the great good luck of having his enemies film his literal fight for survival for full display in a later presidential campaign. For that matter, what, after all, was McCain in his youth? A fighter pilot. Or, as they say, a "flyboy." A modern equivalent of the American cowboy. And what is the cowboy to Americans? A hero. Batman in a hat.

Take note of the difference in the McCain and Obama reactions to the crisis between Russia and Georgia. McCain instantly refers to
"the invasion of Georgia." Obama says he wants to "condemn the outbreak of violence." The difference between the two is vivid. McCain, listening to his gut, is sharply blaming the Russians. He wants them the hell out of there ASAP. Obama is once again the "thinker." Careful not to offend, he refers not to an "invasion," which would imply fault, but an "outbreak of violence," as if both the Georgians and the Russians are equally to blame. And what does Obama's foreign policy adviser Susan Rice say of McCain? She criticizes McCain for "shooting from the hip."

Who in American culture shoots from the hip? Cowboys, of course. Heroes. John Wayne. Gary Cooper. Wyatt Earp. Matt Dillon. One has to ask of Ms. Rice: Is she a secret plant being paid by the McCain campaign to say these things? One can only laugh at the utterly unconscious inability of Obama and his fellow eggheads to understand their own fellow countrymen, let alone human beings around
the rest of the world. All things being equal, who do you think most Americans would prefer to see dealing with the big bad Russians in Georgia? Barack Obama -- or Batman?

THESE COMPETING IMAGES of McCain as the man of action and Obama as the egghead thinker are slowly sinking in with the American electorate of 2008. The same electorate that has rewarded Batman and Rush with millions of viewers, listeners and dollars. 
The same electorate that gets up every single day in this country and looks in the mirror to see their own personal hero or heroine, their own version of Batman or Rush, someone who is fighting with everything they have in their reptilian brain to survive and thrive.

These Americans aren't looking to be led by someone who has to think the whole thing through -- hemming and hawing as they go.

One last irony. It is much commented that the mainstream media is in the tank for Obama. And so they are. What seems not to be understood is that the mainstream media's idea of promotion for Obama is exactly what it was for Kerry or Gore and Dukakis and in the long ago was used as a reason to support a Thomas E. Dewey or Adlai Stevenson. They see the "thinking man as candidate" as a cause for celebration. It escapes them completely that the American people see the same thing as a cause for concern. A gut reason to vote against.

A classic example is the massive coverage given to Obama's European trip. The media -- and certainly Obama -- saw this as a reaching out to others. Displaying Obama's willingness to listen to what others (European others at that) are thinking -- that word again -- and therefore try to please them. Big mistake.

Does Batman really care what others think of him? Does Rush? Did Reagan or Teddy Roosevelt? Are you kidding? In other words, every time the media thinks they are promoting Obama they are in fact doing him damage. Subtle, yet irreversible damage that will eventually begin to show itself in the polling numbers if
it hasn't already.

What will Americans be voting for in 2008? The same thing they have been voting for routinely in every election since the beginning of American presidential elections. They want action. A willingness to risk. They want someone who doesn't give a damn what others think.

They want Batman. They want Rush.

So they will elect McCain.



Jeffrey Lord is the creator, co-founder and CEO of QubeTV, a conservative online video site. 
A Reagan White House political director and author, he writes from Pennsylvania.

 



 


 

 Listen to:  "Jeremiah was my Pastor..."  [Rush Limbaugh/Paul Shankin]  and MORE.

StandUpforMcCain.com 

McCain (left) - Me.jpg 

P.S. The taller 71 year old is your webmaster ... 
Semper Fidelis,  Larry M. Collins


The Best of Rush on TV
 

One of the most frequent questions Rush gets is, "When are you going back to TV?" As the years go by, it becomes more and more obvious that this was a show, like everything else Limbaugh, that was truly on the cutting edge. As a response to the clamor for more Limbaugh on TV, we reached back into the archives of Rush Limbaugh the Television Show for a little excellence in small-screen broadcasting - and created this archive of clips from Rush's wildly popular show.
 
Although we were all there, we'd forgotten just how many of Rush's classic bits, parodies and illustrations of absurdity stood the test of time. Instead of finding just a few clips, we found heaps - and decided to offer up one after another as a special treat to Rush 24/7 members. So far, we've archived over sixty video clips by subject in this permanent collection.
Watch the Best of Rush Limbaugh The TV Show:
 
 
Classic Rush | From Clinton's Closet | Patriotism at its Best | Embarrassing Democrats Feminization of the Nation | Typical Liberals | Our Nation | Illustrating Absurdity
 
Every night for four years, Rush's TV show made history and broke news, doing the job the mainstream press used to do before it sold its soul to liberalism. Though he was born for radio, Rush literally transformed the way television was done - which is why many of his techniques were later picked up by the cable news warriors. Every night on every news channel, you can watch them all imitate what Rush pioneered.

 

 

 

 

 

Operation Chaos ... alive and well ... check it out!

"This would explain why Obama is so frightened of the use of 
his 
middle name, and it might explain Jeremiah Wright's cozying 
up to Calypso Louie Farrakhan and traveling overseas to meet 
Moammar Khadafy in Libya. "

~ Rush Limbaugh,   Commander in Chief, US Operation Chaos.

Read it all:

 


 

Let Me See If I Have This Straight

His father was a Kenyan, Muslim, black. We have seen pictures of his African family.

His mother is from Kansas, atheist, white. Where are the pictures of his Kansan white 
mother and his white grandparents who raised him?

His father deserted his mother and returned to his family in Kenya when he was very young.

His mother married an Indonesian Muslim and took him to live in Jakarta where he attended Muslim schools.

His mother returned to Hawaii and he was raised by his white Kansan grandparents who he has accused of racism.

He later attended the best high dollar American schools, how?

He lives in a $1.4 million dollar house that he acquired through a deal with a very wealthy fund raiser, how?

He "worked" as a civil rights activist in Chicago, has never held a productive job. The presidency is not a civil rights post nor is it subject to affirmative action set asides.

He entered politics at the state level and then the national level with minimal experience and still has only minimal experience.

He is proud of his "African Heritage" but it seems that his only African connection was that his African father made a white girl pregnant and deserted her. I didn't know sperm carried a cultural gene. Where is his pride in his white culture?

He attends an "Afrocentric church that hates whites and Jews and blames America for all the world's perceived faults and problems and repeatedly covers up for the pastor of the racist church.

He claims that he could not confront his pastor but he wants us to believe that he can confront North Korea and Iran. Right!!!

Yeah, I think I can see how he could be a uniter and bring us together. I think his "Hope" is that he hopes no one will put the pieces together.


Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.  was eight years old and lived in Jakarta, Indonesia when  Red Skelton (RIP) delivered this prophetic PLEDGE!

Red Skelton's Pledge of Allegiance

Red Skelton's "Pledge of Allegiance" was first introduced on the Red Skelton Show on January 14, 1969.  It has since been twice read into the congressional record of The United States and has received numerous awards.  4 min 19 sec


If Bush resigned today, this is what his speech could, should, would be ... 

Normally, I start these things out by saying "My Fellow Americans."   happened, and that you're really not fellow Americans any longer. 

Not doing it this time.  If the polls are any indication, I don't know who
more than half of you are anymore.  I do know something terrible has 
I'll cut right to the chase here: I quit.  Now before anyone gets all in a
lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution 
or something, let me assure you: There's been no breaking of laws or 
impeachable offenses in this office.  

The reason I'm quitting is simple.  I'm fed up with you people.

I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really
going on in the world.  Or of what's going on in this once-great
nation of ours.  And the majority of you are too damned lazy to
do your homework and figure it out.
 
Let's start local. You've been sold a bill of goods by politicians
and the news media.  Polls show that the majority of you think
the economy is in the tank. And that's despite record numbers
of homeowners, including record numbers of MINORITY home-
owners.  And while we're mentioning minorities, I'll point out that
minority business ownership is at an all-time high. 

Our unemployment
rate is as low as it ever was during the Clinton
administration.  I've mentioned all those things before, but it doesn't 
seem to have sunk in.
 
Despite the shock to our economy of 9/11, the stock market has 
rebounded to
record levels and more Americans than ever are participating in these markets.

Meanwhile, all you can do is whine about gas prices, and most of you are too
damn stupid to realize that gas prices are high because there's increased demand in other parts of the world, and because a small handful of noisy idiots are more worried about polar bears and beachfront property than your economic security.

Let me remind you that the rest of the world thought Saddam had the goods, same as me.  Let me also remind you that regime change in Iraq was official US policy before I came into office.   

That's not the case this time.  The soldiers of our new enemy don't 
care if they
survive.  In fact, they want to die.  That'd be fine, as long 
as they weren't also
committed to taking as many of you with them 
as they can.  But they are.  They
want to kill you, and the bastards 
are all over the globe.

You should be grateful that they haven't gotten any more of us here 
in the United States since September 11.  But you're not.  That's 
because you've got no idea how hard a small number of i
ntelligence, 
military, law enforcement, and homeland
security people have 
worked to make sure of that.  When this whole mess started,

warned you that this would be a long and difficult
fight.  I'm 
disappointed how many of you people think a long and difficult fight 

Some guy named 'Clinton' established that policy.  Bet you didn't know that, did you?
 
You idiots need to understand that we face a unique enemy. Back during the cold war, there were two major competing political and economic models squaring off. 

We won that war, but we did so because fundamentally, the able to out spend and out-tech them.
 
Communists wanted to survive, just as we do.  We were simply
amounts to a single season of 'Survivor.'
 
Instead, you've grown impatient.  You're incapable of seeing things
through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do.  You think
that wars should last a few months, a few years, tops.

Making matters worse, you actively support those who help the
enemy.  Every time you buy the New York Times, every time you
send a donation to a cut-and-run Democrat's political campaign,
well, dang it, you might just as well FedEx a grenade launcher to a
Jihadist.  It amounts to the same thing.

In this day and age, it's easy enough to find the truth. It's all over the
Internet.  It just isn't on the pages of the New York Times or on NBC 

News.  But even if it were, I doubt you'd be any smarter. Most of you 
would rather watch American Idol.

I could say more about your expectations that the government will 
always be there to bail you out, even if you're too stupid to leave a 
city that's below sea level and has a hurricane approaching. 

Oh, and by the way, Cheney's quitting too.  That means Pelosi is
your new President.  You asked for it.  Watch what she does
carefully, because I still have a glimmer of hope that there are just
enough of you remaining who are smart enough to turn this thing
around in 2008.

So that's it.  God bless what's left of America.  Some of you know 
what I mean.  The rest of you, kiss off.

 >> Be careful what you wish for!

.
_________________
Once A Marine - Always A Marine
Image
Semper Fidelis, Death Angel  '61-64

                         Ugly Angel    '65-66 

 


Sunday morning, February 10th - I received the following from my 1st cousin (2 years my senior) 
... now a  minority in my home state  ...  a Republican in The Land of Lincoln.  Rush would also 
"approve of this message".
 


  My name is Lanny Collins Herlan and I approve of this message.
 
--Springfield, Illinois



Image by FlamingText.com 

I was proud to have received this from my 22 year old granddaughter, Whitney. 
Makes me feel better
knowing someone in our next generation has heart, faith 
and a brain.

 It is time to change from REDNECK humor to TRUE AMERICAN Humor!

Only it isn't seen as HUMOR, but the correct way to
LIVE YOUR LIFE

If you feel the same, pass this on to your True American
friends. Y'all 
know who they are...


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
It never occurred to you to be 
offended by the phrase, "One Nation, Under God."


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You've never protested about 
seeing the 10 Commandments posted in public places.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You still say "Christmas" instead 
of "Winter Festival."


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You bow your head when someone 
prays.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You stand and place your hand over 
your heart when they play the National Anthem.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You treat Vietnam vets with great
respect, and always have.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You've never burned an American flag.

You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You know what you believe and you 
aren't afraid to say so, no matter who is listening.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You respect your elders and expect 
your kids to do the same.


You might be a TRUE AMERICAN if:
You'd give your last dollar to a friend.

If you got this email from me, it is because I believe that you, like me, 
have just
enough TRUE AMERICAN
in you to have the same beliefs as 
those talked about in this email.

God Bless the
U S A !  Amen


I posted the following at a military website this morning.  I strongly suggest you view the video
and if you haven't already cast your primary vote ... be sure you do so after weighing Rush's 
comments.  After this coming (Super) Tuesday it is very possible the GOP Presidential Candidate 
will be a DONE DEAL.  Choose carefully and regardless of who our nominee will be ... we must
defeat the Hussein/Rodham ticket come November.  LMC   

Image Video  Rush Does Not Concede, Vows to Fight On 

 

"Presidential candidates come and go, but I am forever.
I mean, Clinton's gone, and I'm still here, right?"

.

Image.

 _________________
Once A Marine - Always A Marine
Image
Semper Fidelis, 
Death Angel '61-64 
Ugly Angels  '65-66   


 


 


 Rush Limbaugh, Man of the Year ?

Image
Naw, he didn't get the Nobel Peace Prize ... Algore did?


Naw, he didn't get Time's POTY award ... Vladimir Putin did?


ImageImageImageImage

But he is the Human Events Man of the Year!

Image

Image
by Mark R. Levin

Posted: 01/07/2008

Rush Limbaugh’s detractors never learn. They’ve tried everything to come between Rush
and his more than 20 million listeners, intending to destroy his appeal and impact. But it’s
a hopeless, almost laughable endeavor. They led boycotts against his advertisers -- yet
his show continues to generate more revenue than any other on radio. They pressured his
affiliates to drop his program, but he’s still heard on more than 600 stations -- more than
any other talk host. They tried to keep him off Armed Forces Radio, of course, but he has
the most popular program on the military’s radio network.

Will Not Be Intimidated

Try as they might, the Rush-haters cannot silence him, or persuade his massive audience to
tune him out. After two decades as the top talk host in the nation, his ratings are stronger
than ever. He is more popular and influential than ever. And yet, the Rush-haters persist.
Their favorite tactic is to twist Rush’s on-air remarks to make them fit their stereotypes and
to advance their political objectives.

Rush has never bowed to efforts by the left to control our national debate through intimidation
tactics. A few months ago, when the Democrats shamelessly used Graeme Frost, a 12-year-
old who had been in a terrible car accident, to promote the expansion of the State Children’s
Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) entitlement, it was Rush, with information from folks on
conservative websites such as Free Republic, who told America that the Frost family was not
as it was represented to be by the Democrats and the Big Media. The Frosts had been
financially able to purchase health insurance but apparently had chosen not to. Among other
things, the parents sent their two daughters to an expensive private school, at an apparent
cost of $40,000 per year. For exposing this sham, Rush was accused of picking on the poor
seventh grader. Well, as Rush explained at the time, she’d been used, but not by him -- by
her own parents, the Democrats and the media.

Home Run After Home Run

When David Ehrenstein, a Hollywood writer, penned an opinion piece last year in the Los
Angeles Times, characterizing Illinois Democratic Sen. Barak Obama as “The Magic Negro,”
Rush seized the moment to expose liberal hypocrisy with a parody -- “Barak the Magic Negro”
(played to the tune of “Puff the Magic Dragon”). The Rush-haters pounced, claiming falsely
that Rush, not Ehrenstein, was employing a racial slur against Obama. No, Rush was ridiculing
the left, and once again, it hit home. And when Rush was pressured to stop playing the
parody, he defiantly played it over and over again.

During the 2006 elections, the Democrats shamelessly used Michael J. Fox in targeted
congressional races to campaign against Republicans who opposed taxpayer-financed stem-
cell research, including running television ads featuring Fox. And in those commercials, Fox
was visibly shaking from the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. The political message was clear:
Vote against these Republicans because they are heartless people who oppose curing
diseases. Well, Rush would have none of it. He criticized the Democrats’ use of Fox, Fox’s
politicization of a medical issue and the dishonesty of the ads. As usual, the Democrats and
liberal media distorted Rush’s argument, accusing him of mocking Fox and his ailments. They
sought to deflect criticism from their own crude political behavior. But again, they failed.

Most Important Voice on the Right

What is it about Rush that drives the left crazy (that is, crazier than they already are)?
The answer is actually quite simple: Rush is the most important voice in the conservative
movement. Others want to be, some claim to be, but he is. More than any conservative
politician, columnist or pundit, Rush speaks for us. His opinions are principled and consistent.
He has a brilliant mind and a voracious appetite for knowledge and truth, all of which he uses
behind his golden EIB microphone to teach and persuade as he cuts through the daily media
clutter. He has the guts to say what so many of us are thinking to ourselves. And Rush’s
likable and optimistic personality and entertaining style attract increasing numbers of
conservative adherents. Liberals consider Rush and his talk show the greatest threats to
their agenda and pursuit of power, and they’re right.

The most stunning and desperate assault on Rush was launched just a few weeks ago when
the ethically challenged Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) -- armed with
propaganda prepared by a Clinton front group that calls itself “Media Matters for America”
(which also claims to be a tax-exempt charitable foundation) -- tried to use the power of his
office to squelch Rush with a threatening letter, signed by dozens of his Democratic
colleagues, to Rush’s Clear Channel broadcast partner. What was all the fuss about?

During a Morning Update broadcast, Rush criticized fake soldiers such as Jesse MacBeth and
the left’s support for them. MacBeth claimed to have served in Iraq as an Army Ranger.
MacBeth was embraced by the anti-war movement and appeared on several media outlets
solely because of his vicious smears against the United States military. But MacBeth was a
fraud. He was forced out of the Army in 44 days and never received the Purple Heart, as he
had claimed. A press release from the United States attorney’s office that prosecuted
MacBeth, among other fake soldiers, states:

“Jesse MacBeth, 23, Tacoma, Wash., sentenced today in connection with his fraudulent claims
of military service. MacBeth sought medical benefits claiming to suffer from PTSD related to
service in Iraq and Afghanistan, in fact, Macbeth was discharged from the Army about a
month after he joined. MacBeth never traveled outside the U.S. with the Army. Macbeth
duped reporters, claiming to be a decorated Army Ranger who had witnessed war crimes.”

In a subsequent conversation with a caller who complained that the media “never talk to real
soldiers,” Rush referred to these fake soldiers as “phony soldiers.” There was nothing remotely
controversial about his statement. But Media Matter